Cases 111 - 120 of 487
Darnell v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv01065
Plaintiff:
Ronny Darnell
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Don Suttmiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00399
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendiola v. Jones
as 4:2012cv00535
Petitioner:
Moises Eli Mendiola
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barber v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv01051
Plaintiff:
Maxie C Barber
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Claude Chester, Mark Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hess v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv01040
Plaintiff:
Ronald Charles Hess
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Rogers County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Jones
as 6:2012cv00386
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Taylor
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Emerson v. Jones
as 5:2012cv00990
Petitioner:
Michael P Emerson
Defendant:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hess v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Hess
Defendant:
Justin Jones, State of Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Rogers County, Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv00944
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lemmons v. Houston et al
as 5:2012cv00940
Plaintiff:
Tobin Don Lemmons
Defendant:
Michael Houston, Jeff Troutt, Justin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
