Cases 111 - 120 of 126
Lyralisa Lavena Stevens v. Kathleen Dickinson et al
as 5:2009cv01965
Plaintiff:
Lyralisa Lavena Stevens
Defendant:
Kathleen Dickinson and J Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Orlando Branch v. Kathleen Dickinson
as 2:2009cv07238
Petitioner:
Orlando Branch
Respondent:
Kathleen Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Dickinson et al
as 2:2009cv02667
Plaintiff:
Bennie R. Wilson
Defendant:
Kathleen Dickinson and N. Mercardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Dooley et al
as 2:2009cv02525
Plaintiff:
Thomas T. Alford
Defendant:
Mary Dooley, Deborah Peterson, Heather Shirley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tran v. Dickinson
as 4:2009cv03993
Petitioner:
Cuong V. Tran
Respondent:
Kathleen Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Harding v. Kathleen Dickinson
as 09-56181
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK L. HARDING
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden (A)
Raymond Turner v. Kathleen Dickinson
as 2:2009cv05508
Petitioner:
Raymond Turner
Respondent:
Kathleen Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Cruz v. Dickinson
as 2:2009cv02046
Petitioner:
Alberto Cruz
Respondent:
Kathleen Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond F Garcia v. Kathleen Dickinson
as 8:2009cv00785
Petitioner:
Raymond F Garcia
Respondent:
Kathleen Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Tuanja Anderson v. Kathleen Dickinson, et al
as 09-16345
Petitioner - Appellant:
TUANJA EDWARD ANDERSON
Appellee:
KATHLEEN DICKINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ROSEANNE CAMPBELL and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
