Cases 111 - 120 of 148
Daniels v. Iowa State Penitentiary
as 4:2019cv00148
Respondent:
Iowa State Penitentiary
Petitioner:
Derrick Daniels
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brewbaker v. Miller
as 4:2019cv00146
Respondent:
Thomas Miller
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Chad Brewbaker and Polk County Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Johnson
as 4:2019cv00120
Respondent:
Bob Johnson
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Michael Charles Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lajeunesse v. Schmunk
as 4:2019cv00116
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Defendant:
Gregory Schmunk
Petitioner:
Michael A. Lajeunesse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrews v. Wachtendorf
as 4:2019cv00101
Respondent:
Patti Wachtendorf
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Renard Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bolden v. McKinney et al
as 4:2019cv00078
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, State of Iowa and James McKinney
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Darrel Bolden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doyle v. Watchendorf
as 4:2019cv00077
Respondent:
Patty Watchendorf
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Tyrone Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Department of Corrections
as 4:2019cv00076
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Saul Gonzalez
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meksavanh v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2019cv00075
Respondent:
State of Iowa, Attorney General of State of Iowa and James McKinney
Petitioner:
Somvang Meksavanh
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00038
Petitioner:
Jesse Gordon Woods
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
