Cases 111 - 120 of 371
Carlos Alberto Hernandez v. The County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv03869
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center, Warden Lewis Milusnic, Lieutenant D. Ephraim and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chester v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00385
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center and Michelle Lujan-Grisham
Plaintiff:
Josh Chester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duran v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00391
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center, Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Chief Ralph Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Duran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00388
Plaintiff:
Stephen Goldman
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham and Metropolitan Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center and Michelle Lujan-Grisham
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00375
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center, Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Lisa Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00386
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center and Michelle Lujan-Grisham
Plaintiff:
Douglas Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00392
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center and Michelle Lujan-Grisham
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barron v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00377
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center and Michelle Lujan-Grisham
Plaintiff:
Erick Barron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayuk v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2020cv00389
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center and Michelle Lujan-Grisham
Plaintiff:
Santana Bayuk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
