Cases 111 - 120 of 770
M'wanza-El v. Davis et al
as 3:2019cv00679
Defendant:
Frank Dressen, NDOC, Scott Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Tacuma J. M'wanza-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Barrett v. State of Nevada, et al
as 19-17271
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES DZURENDA, RENE BAKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH DON BARRETT
Jamal Hendrix v. Shery Foster, et al
as 19-17264
Defendant:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, GREGGORY SMITH, R. SPIERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERY L. FOSTER, ISAAC WINSON, JAMES GREG COX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX
Simpson v. Baker et al
as 2:2019cv01943
Petitioner:
Derrick Simpson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Humboldt Conservation Camp
Defendant:
Renee Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Henderson v. Renee Baker, et al
as 19-17239
Respondent / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH HENDERSON
Ruel Mercado v. Renee Baker
as 19-72793
Respondent:
RENEE BAKER, Warden
Petitioner:
RUEL SALVA MERCADO
Stacey Richards v. James Cox, et al
as 19-17193
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, MICHAEL BYRNE and MICHAEL FLETCHER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STACEY M. RICHARDS
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES GREG COX, ERIC BOARDMAN and RENEE BAKER, Warden
Codie Walker v. Renee Baker, et al
as 19-17107
Respondent / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
CODIE M.S. WALKER
Willie Smith, Jr. v. Renee Baker
as 19-72639
Respondent:
RENEE BAKER, Warden
Petitioner:
WILLIE J. SMITH, Jr.
Victor Tagle v. State of Nevada, et al
as 19-17049
Defendant / Appellee:
C. ROWLY, Guard, STATE OF NEVADA, JAME DZURENDA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE, AKA Victor Tagle, AKA Victor Tagle, Sr., AKA Victor Manuel Tagle-Moreno
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
