Cases 111 - 120 of 1,587
Edwards v. Nurse Jane Doe et al
as 1:2022cv03503
Plaintiff:
Richard Edwards
Defendant:
Nurse Jane Doe, Nurse Cox, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv03435
Plaintiff:
Colin McNichols
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Superintendant Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv03366
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Rashied Washington
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinet v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02916
Plaintiff:
Richard Vinet
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, K. Sankey, Cook County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2022cv02794
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County, Thomas Dart, Superintendent of Div-8-RTU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02490
Plaintiff:
Frank Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Greene and J.T.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epps v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02393
Plaintiff:
Chase Epps
Defendant:
THOMAS DART, Amanda Gallegos, Superintendent Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Countryman v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv02152
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Countryman
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections, Thomas Dart and Mr. Cindron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haymond v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02065
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Haymond
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, as Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois Cook County and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ford v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02064
Plaintiff:
Henry Ford
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
