Cases 111 - 120 of 152
Bolen v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 7:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Beverly Bolen
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stokes v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sondra Stokes
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., Zicam LLC, Botanical Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Traylor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 7:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jerry Traylor
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hutui v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Silvia Hutui
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nance v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Tracy Nance
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Klaserner v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Wanda Klaserner
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rowland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Shirlene Rowland
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and The Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 6:2001cv00339
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Movant:
Kentucky Office of Employment and Training
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Lovitt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 6:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
Donna Lovitt and Donna Lovitt
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
