Cases 111 - 120 of 266
WEBER et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv07257
Plaintiff:
JANE WEBER
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WEBER v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06125
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WEBER
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv05902
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LAWRENCE v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2012cv04527
Petitioner:
LLOYD G. LAWRENCE
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTIN v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2012cv04022
Petitioner:
MATTHEW J. MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD, MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY FREEHOLD, NEW JERSEY, SCOTT A. WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03338
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FOFANA v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv03042
Petitioner:
FODAY FOFANA
Respondent:
ROY HENDRICKS, SCOTT WEBER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02806
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02498
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02396
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
