Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 111 - 120 of 10,351
ROLLINS v. OTTMAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00605
Plaintiff: LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant: JULIE OTTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROLLINS v. MONTGOMERY
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff: LAKEISHA BOLLINS and LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant: STEPHEN MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ISOM v. NELSON
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff: TYESHA ISOM
Defendant: JANE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SOOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: EMERY SOOS
Defendant: DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and WALT C. DANNENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT v. VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608-1775 et al
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff: TYRONE HURT
Defendant: VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608-1775, NATIONAL MUSUEM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY AND CULTURE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HURT v. VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608- 1775 et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff: TYRONE HURT
Defendant: VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608- 1775, AMERICAN HERITAGE COLLEGE DICTIONARY and FORMER LORTON COMPLEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
FREDERICK v. PEPCO
as 1:2024cv00579
Plaintiff: TYANNA FREDERICK
Defendant: PEPCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024mc00032
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00584
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?