Cases 111 - 120 of 8,426
Struble v. Tope
as 9:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
David E. Struble
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandford III v. Warden
as 9:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
James Edward Sandford, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Philippe v. USA
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Philippe
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Khalil v. Farideh P.
as 9:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Ahmed S. Khalil, Ahmed Shawki Mohamed Khalil and Ahmed Q.
Respondent:
Farideh P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Drake v. Rubera et al
as 9:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Devon Drake
Defendant:
Tyler Rubera, Ethan Schmid, Steven Vulaj and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Annucci
as 9:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Jason A. Vega
Respondent:
Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. Jefferson County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Disability Rights New York
Defendant:
Jefferson County Correctional Facility, County of Jefferson, Sheriff Peter R. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazzeo v. Superintendent
as 9:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
David Mazzeo
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkland v. Russell et al
as 9:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kirkland
Defendant:
Officer Russell, Officer Monroe, Sergeant Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
