Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Cases 111 - 120 of 8,431
Cuello v. Weaver et al
as 9:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: Edwin Cuello
Defendant: Alan Weaver, Donald Simonds and Daniel McGowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bumpars v. Corey
as 9:2024cv00054
Petitioner: Devante Andrew Bumpars
Respondent: The People of the State of New York, DOCCS and Joseph Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 9:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Manuel Rivera
Defendant: NYS DOCCS, C.O. Mannarino, Sgt. Mayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. McGuiness
as 9:2024cv00046
Petitioner: Tommy Davis
Respondent: Thomas McGuiness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Potter v. Tompkins County et al
as 9:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: Mark Potter
Defendant: Tompkins County and Cayuga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Struble v. Tope
as 9:2024cv00042
Petitioner: David E. Struble
Respondent: Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00041
Plaintiff: Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandford III v. Warden
as 9:2024cv00025
Petitioner: James Edward Sandford, III
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Philippe v. USA
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner: Emmanuel Philippe
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Khalil v. Farideh P.
as 9:2024cv00034
Petitioner: Ahmed S. Khalil, Ahmed Shawki Mohamed Khalil and Ahmed Q.
Respondent: Farideh P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?