Cases 111 - 120 of 159
Gavin v. People of the State
as 1:2015cv06241
Plaintiff:
James Gavin
Defendant:
People of the State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Love v. Medical College of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2015cv00650
Plaintiff:
Robert B Love
Defendant:
Medical College of Wisconsin , Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Alfred C Nicolosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00541
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Kevin N. Colquitt v. Abbott Labs. et al
as 1:2015cv03641
Plaintiff:
Kevin N. Colquitt
Defendant:
Abbott Labs., Abbott Vascular Solutions, Inc. and Ross Milner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2015cv00405
Plaintiff:
Charity Dunson
Defendant:
Cook County, City Of Chicago and CPD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheet Metal Workers Internatio v. Horning Investments, LLC
as 15-1004
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex. rel Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local Union No. 20
Appellant:
SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 20
Defendant - Appellee:
HORNING INVESTMENTS, LLC, doing business as Horning Roofing & Sheet Metal Company, LLC
Truly, Gina et al v. State of WI - Division of Housing et al
as 3:2014cv00842
Plaintiff:
Gina Truly and United States of America
Defendant:
State of WI - Division of Housing and City of Baraboo CDA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Swift, v. DelivercareRX, Inc.
as 1:2014cv07976
Plaintiff:
Suppressed
Defendant:
Suppressed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
[Lloyd] v. CITI umbrella
as 1:2014cv06585
Plaintiff:
Sharon Renee [Lloyd]
Defendant:
CITI umbrella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose Presser v. Acacia Mental Health Clinic, et al
as 14-2804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSE PRESSER
Defendant - Appellee:
ACACIA MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC LLC and ABE FREUND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
