Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Cases 111 - 120 of 5,758
Erika Mabes, et al v. Angela McFeeley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff: ERIKA MABES, individually and on behalf of L.M., J.R.M., and J.A.M., minor children and BRIAN MABES, individually and on behalf of L.M., J.R.M., and J.A.M., minor children
Defendant: ANGELA MCFEELEY, NATASHA DAVIS, COURTNEY OAKES and others
Indiana Land Trust #3082, et al v. Hammond Redevelopment Commission, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff: INDIANA LAND TRUST #3082, OMAR ABUZIR, HAITHAM ABUZIR and others
Defendant: HAMMOND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, THOMAS MCDERMOTT, in his individual and official capacity, TONY HAUPRICH, in his individual and official capacity and others
Shawnqiz Lee v. Eric Harris, et al
as 24-1053
Plaintiff: SHAWNQIZ LEE
Defendant: ERIC HARRIS, Detective, BRANDON POFELSKI, Detective and CITY OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS
Wayde Coleman v. Josh Peters, et al
as 23-3353
Plaintiff / Appellant: WAYDE COLEMAN and WAYDE M. COLEMAN, II
Defendant / Appellee: JOSH A. PETERS, CINDY PALMER, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, Marion County and others
Maverick Young v. State of Indiana
as 23-3408
Plaintiff: MAVERICK A. YOUNG
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA
Gormidou Lavela v. Meridian Group, Incorporated, et al
as 24-1117
Plaintiff: GORMIDOU Y. LAVELA
Defendant: MERIDIAN GROUP, INCORPORATED, RODNEY TAPP, VALICIA GILBERT and others
Gormidou Lavela v. Randell Peterson
as 24-1118
Plaintiff: GORMIDOU Y. LAVELA
Defendant: RANDELL D. PETERSON
Linda Setlech v. Alexi Giannoulias
as 23-3406
Plaintiff: LINDA A. SETLECH
Defendant: ALEXI GIANNOULIAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1133
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Harry Rapp v. SSM Agnesian Health, et al
as 24-1033
Plaintiff: HARRY R. RAPP
Defendant: SSM AGNESIAN HEALTH, KIMBERLY ROGERS and PAT GUELL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?