Cases 111 - 120 of 12,986
Robertson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Damon Colter Robertson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moffett v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Casey D. Moffett
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bourgeois v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03052
Plaintiff:
Fred Bourgeois
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hills v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Sharee R. Hills
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Theiss v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Myra J Theiss
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chaloupka v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Marli Ann Chaloupka
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wyrick v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A Wyrick
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Dunlap v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Dunlap
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chmiel v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Mark E Chmiel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Andersen v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03003
Plaintiff:
Cynda Lynn Andersen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
