Cases 111 - 120 of 44,466
(HC) Madero v. The People
as 1:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Eric Cruz Madero
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Flores v. The People
as 1:2024cv00444
Petitioner:
Joaquin Flores
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Calderon v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Calderon
Defendant:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Storm v. Newsom et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Z. Storm
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Robert Bonta and B. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Eastman v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01107
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Todd Eastman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court of State of California, County of Kings
as 2:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court of State of California, County of Kings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vasquez v. Market Square et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Vasquez
Defendant:
Market Square and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Madding v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Michael David Madding
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
