Cases 111 - 120 of 429,338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MIRANDA v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MIRANDA
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SEARLE V. BLACKHAWK TRANSPORT, INC.
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Diane Searle
Defendant:
Blackhawk Transport, Inc. and BLACKHAWK TRANSPORT INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
GAPHOOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
DAVE GAPHOOR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ROBINSON v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
as 4:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Latavius Robinson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MARTINEZ v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARTINEZ
Defendant:
AKA "Tim" DEFENDANT 1, AKA Janie Quintero DEFENDANT 2, AKA "Martin" DEFENDANT 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TATE v. OKALOOSA CORRECTION INSTITUTION
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE KEVIN TATE, III
Defendant:
OKALOOSA CORRECTION INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIRTLEY v. MOSIASHVILI et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kirtley
Defendant:
Lasha Mosiashvili, GOB Auto, LLC and GOB AUTO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
PETERS v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
JEREMIE ODELL PETERS
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
