Cases 111 - 120 of 463
Thompson et al v. Medtronic et al
as 2:2016cv03013
Plaintiff:
Darrell K. Thompson , William T. Holt , Leatha J. Holt and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. , Physio-Control International, Inc. , Physio-Control, Inc. and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Nicor, Inc. v. Universal Companies, LLC
as 2:2016cv03004
Defendant:
Nicor, Inc. and Universal Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JPW Industries, Inc. v. Olympia Tools International, Inc.
as 3:2016cv03153
Plaintiff:
JPW Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Olympia Tools International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Construction Ventures Corporation v. Nikon Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02867
Plaintiff:
Construction Ventures Corporation
Defendant:
Nikon Manufacturing, Inc. and Dakota Plumbing Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Susan McKnight, Inc. v. Milo Enterprises Inc. d/b/a Aspectek
as 2:2016cv02874
Plaintiff:
Susan McKnight, Inc.
Defendant:
Milo Enterprises Inc. d/b/a Aspectek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grace v. Fairmont Designs
as 2:2016cv02863
Defendant:
Fairmont Designs
Plaintiff:
Dale Grace
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
WCM Industries, Inc. v. IPS Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv02844
Plaintiff:
WCM Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
IPS Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Southwire Company, LLC v. Innovative Tool LLC et al (TV1)
as 3:2016cv00598
Plaintiff:
Southwire Company, LLC
Defendant:
Innovative Tool LLC, David Jordan and Michael Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Radio Systems Corporation v. ShenZhen Sailvan Network Technology Ltd. (RLJ2)
as 3:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
Radio Systems Corporation
Defendant:
ShenZhen Sailvan Network Technology Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Orange et al v. Rotary Corporation
as 3:2016cv00834
Plaintiff:
Charles Orange , Steve Eller , Batlock, LLC and others
Defendant:
Rotary Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
