Cases 111 - 120 of 1,372
United States of America v. Douglas
as 3:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kenneth Martin Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Haapaniemi v. State of AK Office of Children's Services et al
as 3:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
State of AK Office of Children's Services, State of AK Dept. of Corrections, Jonas Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carinio v. Houser
as 3:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Carinio Ernesto and Ernesto Carinio
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stansberry v. Enter White House Admins
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter White House Admins
Dolan v. Clawson et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Justin Dolan
Defendant:
Clawson, Meng and Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Xayamonty
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Xenophon Xayamonty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Webb v. Dunleavy et al
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Dionte T. Webb
Defendant:
Mike Dunleavy, Nancy Dahlstrom, Arlando Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Houser
as 4:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Stanely E. Smith
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bavilla v. Hamilton
as 3:2022cv00286
Petitioner:
Vernon Baville and Vernon S. Bavilla
Defendant:
Jason Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dillard v. Irvin et al
as 3:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Andrew Irvin, Brandon Jones, Robert G. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
