Cases 111 - 120 of 10,438
Ray v. May
as 4:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Taquashone Ray
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. USA
as 5:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Elmer Curtis Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Milliron v. USA
as 3:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
William B. Milliron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Banks v. Stokes et al.
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III, Chuck Banks and Chuckie Banks
Defendant:
Michael T. Stokes, C. Holycross, D. Deangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gulley v. Howell et al.
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jesse-James Gulley, Jr.
Defendant:
Aaron P. Howell, James S. Gwin, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Henry et al.
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Patrick Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher Henry, Officer Riee, Nurse Amanda Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Young v. Wright et al.
as 1:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Alan Wilson, Donald J. Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks, III v. Bianchims et al.
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Melody Bianchims, C. Holycross, D. Deangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Rush et al.
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Derek Edward Rush
Defendant:
Melissa Ann Rush and Catherine J. Hastings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boey v. Brunswick Hills Township et al.
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Adam Joshua Boey
Defendant:
Brunswick Hills Township, City of Brunswick, Przemyslaw Piekut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
