Cases 111 - 120 of 17,749
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Holbrook
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
Destin Dezwyn Reese
Defendant:
Judge Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sowell v. The Ohio State University et al
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Juliano Sowell
Defendant:
The Ohio State University and Franklin County Sheriff's Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 4:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Respondent:
Warden Warden, Marion Correctional Institution and Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eckstein v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Eckstein
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith and Jennifer Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. The State Of Ohio
as 2:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
The State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bugno v. Hunsinger
as 4:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Alex Bugno
Respondent:
Warden Angela Hunsinger-Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. City of Lorain et al.
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Nancy Smith
Defendant:
City of Lorain, Joel Miller, Russ Cambarare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. USA
as 1:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
DeShawn A. White
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Bryan Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
