Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 121 - 128 of 128
Anderson v. Price et al
as 7:2007cv00466
Petitioner: Fredrick Lydel Anderson
Respondent: Cheryl Price and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grigsby v. Ronnie Mack Kent et al
as 2:2007cv00430
Petitioner: Kimberly Share Grigsby
Respondent: Ronnie Mack Kent, Blount County Jail and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coughlin v. Hale et al
as 2:2007cv00418
Petitioner: Harry J. Coughlin, Jr.
Respondent: Mike Hale and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colvin v. Mosley et al
as 2:2007cv00389
Petitioner: Ronnie L Colvin
Respondent: Gwendolyn Mosley and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Jones, et al
as 5:2007cv00213
Petitioner: Arthur Earl Thompson, Jr
Respondent: K Jones and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagley v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2007cv00091
Petitioner: James Edward Bagley
Respondent: Sharon Price, Attorney General of State of Alabama, The and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mickens v. Copes et al
as 7:2007cv00093
Petitioner: Myron Dewone Mickens
Respondent: Gary Copes and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Hooks, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2003cv02913
Petitioner: Aaron Lamont Johnson
Respondent: Ralph Hooks and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?