Cases 121 - 130 of 307
Mitcheson et. al. v. MPR Illusions, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2018cv05802
Plaintiff:
Paola Canas, Marta Krupa, Joanna Krupa and others
Defendant:
Shaya Yampolskiy, Babylon Entertainment, LLC, MPR Illusions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vargas-Garcia v. Mexican Fast Food Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06643
Defendant:
Misael Estrada, Mexican Fast Food Inc. and Claudia Bravo
Plaintiff:
Oralia Vargas-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wu et al v. Diamond et al
as 1:2018cv03842
Defendant:
Cherry Bombe, Inc and Kerry Diamond
Plaintiff:
Claudia Wu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03584
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Agyeman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv05320
Plaintiff:
Roberta Agyeman , Joseph Ameyaw , Edward Ahern and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Colliton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv05295
Plaintiff:
Claudia Ursula Harris Colliton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lacelle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2018cv00616
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Margit Claudia Lacelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
