Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 248
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Path Medical, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv02848
Defendant: Harley Lewin, 1-800-411-PAIN Referral Service, LLC, Path Medical, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Geico Indemnity Co., Geico General Insurance Company, Government Employees Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. PENNSAUKEN SPINE AND REHAB P.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv11727
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. and others
Defendant: PENNSAUKEN SPINE AND REHAB P.C. , DOMINIC MARIANI, D.C. , MARK A BOLINGER, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. J.D. D'AGOSTINI, D.C. D/B/A ALLIED HEALTH CENTER, et al
as 2:2017cv06620
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: J.D. D'AGOSTINI, D.C. D/B/A ALLIED HEALTH CENTER, BOUND BROOK FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, JOSEPH D. D'AGOSTINI, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. INSTERSTATE MULTI-SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv05725
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: INSTERSTATE MULTI-SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., HIGHLAND MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., ALEXANDR ZAITSEV and others
Cross_claimant: ANTONIO CICCONE
Cross_defendant: ANTONIO CICCONE , MARCIA COPELAND, M.D., EUGENE GORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Seeknay, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00781
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co. , Geico Indemnity Co. and Geico General Insurance Company
Defendant: Seeknay, LLC , Jaguar Glassworks Pros, LLC and Glass Replacements, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Vision Glass & Plate Glass, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03845
Defendant: Vision Glass & Plate Glass, Inc., Susan Kopacz, Matthew Kopacz and others
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., Geico Casualty Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. BOULEVARD MEDICAL OFFICE, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv04037
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY, CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: BOULEVARD MEDICAL OFFICE, P.C., ALAN F. ASTALOS, D.C. and STEPHEN H. HUISH, D.O.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GEICO, et al v. Tri County Neurology, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2113
Plaintiff - Appellee: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO, GEICO INDEMNITY CO and GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO
Respondent - Appellee: GEICO CASUALTY CO
Defendant - Appellant: TRI COUNTY NEUROLOGY AND REHABILITATION LLC, NABIL YAZGI and THOMAS SENATORE
Defendant - Appellee: HUDSON NEUROLOGY & PAIN MANAGEMENT LLC, SCOTT MURPHY, Sergeant, JAMES D. RAINEY and others
Defendant: MICHAEL I. HADDAD and CHIROPRACTIC CARE
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Alternative Medical Center of Florida, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv21375
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co. , Geico Indemnity Co. , Geico General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Alternative Medical Center of Florida, Inc. , Ivet Sanchez, Michael W. Formisano, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Medical Wellness Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv21360
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Co. , Geico Indemnity Co. , Geico General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Medical Wellness Services, Inc. , Noel Santos, LMT , Jorge Rafael Coll, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?