Cases 121 - 130 of 155
Smith v. Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv20896
Petitioner:
Martin Smith
Respondent:
Department Of Corrections, Department Of Corrections, James McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUNTIN v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D BUNTIN
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peterson v. McDonough et al
as 2:2007cv14074
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antone Peterson
Defendant:
James McDonough and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERVY v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 5:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD D HERVY
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH, ARAMARK CORRECTIONS CORPORATION, DOROTHY BRAXSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00056
Petitioner:
GENERAL GRANT BELL
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 3:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
CARLOS KING
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH and ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00329
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00103
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROBINSON v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE ROBINSON
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH, JAMES CROSBY, ORLESTER DICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. McDonough et al
as 0:2007cv60342
Petitioner:
Willie Phillips
Respondent:
James McDonough, James McDonough and Charlie Crist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
