Cases 121 - 130 of 152
U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee et al v. Roeber's Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2009cv05177
Plaintiff:
U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee, U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee, U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee and others
Defendant:
Roeber's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Vannest, Sr. v. Wachovia Mortgage et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2009cv02960
Plaintiff:
David L. Vannest, Sr.
Defendant:
Wachovia Mortgage, World Savings Bank FSB, ATM Financial, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Vannest, Sr. v. Wachovia Mortgage et al
as 2:2009at01699
Plaintiff:
David L. Vannest, Sr.
Defendant:
Wachovia Mortgage, World Savings Bank FSB, ATM Financial, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan et al v. Glass Guru, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2009cv03863
Plaintiff:
Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Glass Guru, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Northern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan et al v. Sunrise Windows & Doors, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2009cv03819
Plaintiff:
Northern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, Northern California Glaziers Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, District Council 16 Northern California Health & Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Sunrise Windows & Doors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee et al v. South City Refrigeration Inc
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2009cv03219
Plaintiff:
U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee, U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee, U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee and others
Defendant:
South City Refrigeration Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Sarratt v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv03237
Petitioner:
James William Sarratt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee et al v. Savior Plumbing, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2009cv02839
Plaintiff:
U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee, U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee, U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee and others
Defendant:
Savior Plumbing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
McKinney v. Law Office of James Duncan et al
as 3:2009cv02605
Plaintiff:
James William McKinney
Defendant:
Law Office of James Duncan, David Eyster and Peyman Hedayati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2009cv03454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.