Cases 121 - 130 of 2,338
Airoldi v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Mike Airoldi
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Benter v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Samuel Benter
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cazarez v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Cazarez
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Destiny Patino et al v. United Parcel Service Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Destiny Patino and Kelvin Melo
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Rudy Gonzalez, United Parcel Service Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Smith v. Roadie, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Amber Smith
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Roadie, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Silverio v. Hall et al
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Silverio
Defendant:
Clinton Hall and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
