Cases 121 - 130 of 61,472
Max Delphin v. Armand
as 1:2024cv03396
Other:
Guy-max delphin
Defendant:
Jacques Junior Armand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Imperioli v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Elio Imperioli
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stone v. USA
as 3:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Ralph B. Stone
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Humble v. Kovacs
as 1:2024cv03404
Plaintiff:
Jason Humble
Defendant:
David J Kovacs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Koerick v. Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2024cv03289
Plaintiff:
James Koerick
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Scanlon et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03273
Plaintiff:
Joyce Scanlon and George Scanlon
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Myer et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03277
Plaintiff:
Margaret Myer and Demirhan Yenigun
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tenempaguay v. Cajigas et al
as 1:2024cv03395
Plaintiff:
Angel David Moncayo Tenempaguay
Defendant:
Michael Anthony Cajigas, Sauder Transport Company and R.W. Sauder, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03283
Plaintiff:
Robert Harris and Kathleen Harris
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
American United Transportation Inc. v. USPS et al
as 1:2024cv03278
Plaintiff:
American United Transportation Inc.
Defendant:
USPS and Willie Lee White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
