Cases 121 - 130 of 7,471
Greene v. Connections Education, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05967
Plaintiff:
Andrea Greene
Defendant:
Connections Education, LLC and Connections Education, LLC Short Term Disability Income Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Phillips v. Douglas County, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv05932
Plaintiff:
Eric Phillips
Defendant:
Douglas County, Georgia and Douglas County Fire/EMS Department
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Paul v. SPB Hospitality, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05912
Plaintiff:
Ereka Thompson Paul
Defendant:
SPB Hospitality, LLC and J. Alexander's Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Kawczak v. Earle M. Jorgerson Co. et al
as 1:2023cv05906
Plaintiff:
Stefan Kawczak
Defendant:
Earle M. Jorgerson Co., Reliance Steel & Aluminum Company and Phoenix Metals Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Rollins v. Anytime Heating Cooling & Plumbing, LLC
as 1:2023cv05837
Plaintiff:
James Rollins
Defendant:
Anytime Heating Cooling & Plumbing, LLC
Bryant v. C&M Defense Group LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05848
Plaintiff:
Makita Bryant
Defendant:
C&M Defense Group LLC, Charles Reedy, Jr. and Reginald Daniels
WEATHERSPOON v. PRUITTHEALTH PHARMACY SERVICES - VALDOSTA, INC.
as 7:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
ZAKOYA WEATHERSPOON
Defendant:
PRUITTHEALTH PHARMACY SERVICES - VALDOSTA INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Martin v. NanoLumens, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05805
Plaintiff:
Warren Martin
Defendant:
Nanolumens, Inc. a Georgia corporation doing business as Nanolumens
Diallo v. DTG Operations, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05769
Plaintiff:
Alpha Amadou Diallo
Defendant:
DTG Operations, Inc.
Schulz v. FirstKey Homes, LLC
as 1:2023cv05757
Plaintiff:
Gilman Schulz, III
Defendant:
FirstKey Homes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
