Cases 121 - 130 of 3,853
Thomas v. May
as 1:2023cv00855
Petitioner:
Damian Thomas
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montgomery v. Lieutenant Satterfield et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Vernon Montgomery
Defendant:
Lieutenant Satterfield, Deputy Warden Johnathan Beck and Lieutenant Coviello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett and Ty
Defendant:
Robert May, Shafer, Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreta v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv00806
Petitioner:
Jose Moreta
Respondent:
Kathleen Jennings and Warden Robert May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Doyle et al
as 1:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Lance L. Parker
Defendant:
Mary Dayle, Officer Malloy, Officer Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Heishman et al
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wright
Defendant:
Heishman, Demby Mucha, Dicampli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroman v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00733
Petitioner:
Pernell Stroman
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casson v. Currington et al
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Malcom Casson
Defendant:
Sgt. Currington, Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meades v. May
as 1:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Meades
Defendant:
Warden Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
