Cases 121 - 130 of 23,063
Pierre-Lys v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02759
Petitioner:
Roodolph L. Pierre-Lys
Respondent:
State of New York and Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peralta v. Khouri
as 1:2024cv02760
Plaintiff:
Jimy J. Peralta
Defendant:
Doctor Khouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Badamo
as 1:2024cv01751
Plaintiff:
Quandell Hickman
Defendant:
Hon. Angela J. Badamo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urena v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01886
Plaintiff:
Amaury Urena
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Justice and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halliburton v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01891
Petitioner:
Keith Halliburton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lu v. Hermans et al
as 7:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Jianqiao Lu
Defendant:
George Hermans, Sulahuddeen Azim and Westchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bahadorifar v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02732
Plaintiff:
Bahadorifar
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Viera v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
Wigberto E. Viera
Defendant:
United States of America, DEA Special Agent Todd Riley, AUSA Tatiana R. Martins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv02535
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
Mayor Adams, NYC Dept. of Corrections and The People of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jaber v. Hanley
as 1:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Jaber
Defendant:
Christina Hanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
