Cases 131 - 140 of 11,835
Laltitude LLC et al v. Shantou Gaowo Science & Education Toys Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Laltitude LLC and Laltitude LLC doing business as Picasso Tiles
Petitioner:
Yongqun Wang
Defendant:
Shantou Gaowo Science & Education Toys Co., LTD, Gowoltd Inc. and Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Dynamic Ticket Systems LLC v. Ticketmaster LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Dynamic Ticket Systems LLC
Defendant:
Ticketmaster LLC and Live Nation Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VDPP, LLC v. Bang & Olufsen America, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
VDPP, LLC
Defendant:
Bang & Olufsen America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Henderson v. Huupe
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lukas Henderson
Defendant:
Huupe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Kenny Phan et al v. Nayax LTD et al
as 8:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Kenny Phan and George Samaha
Defendant:
Nayax LTD, Nayax LLC and DOES 1 through DOE 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
EcoFactor, Inc. v. Google LLC
as 4:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
EcoFactor, Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BowFlex Inc. v. Aslan et al
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
BowFlex Inc.
Defendant:
Umut Aslan and Selim Aslan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Sercomm USA INC. v. CDN Innovations LLC
as 4:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Sercomm USA Inc.
Defendant:
CDN Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Merritt v. Inc. et al
as 3:2024mc80004
Plaintiff:
Splunk Inc.
Respondent:
Cribl Inc.
Defendant:
Clint Sharp
Petitioner:
Douglas Merritt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
