Cases 131 - 140 of 560
Bankston v. Lee et al
as 4:2015cv00142
Petitioner:
Charles Bankston
Respondent:
Earnest Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glasper v. Hogan et al
as 4:2015cv00136
Petitioner:
Oscar Glasper
Respondent:
Norris Hogan and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Fields et al
as 1:2015cv00166
Petitioner:
Willie Smith
Respondent:
Marshall Fields and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2015cv00132
Petitioner:
Steven Gregory Miller
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibbs v. Simon et al
as 4:2015cv00131
Petitioner:
Henry Gibbs, Jr.
Respondent:
Lee Simon, Stanciel and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Banks
as 3:2015cv00669
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace
Defendant:
Unknown Banks and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rice v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2015cv00126
Petitioner:
David Lee Rice
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Page v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Petitioner:
Isreal Page
Respondent:
Earnest Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willis v. Fisher et al
as 4:2015cv00119
Petitioner:
Derrick Willis
Respondent:
Marshall Fisher and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharp v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv00160
Petitioner:
Timothy R. Sharp
Respondent:
Ernest Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
