Cases 131 - 140 of 200
Iglesias v. Federal Bureau of Prisons - USP Atlanta et al
as 1:2010cv02980
Plaintiff:
Erick Guillermo Valle Iglesias
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons - USP Atlanta and Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Torres v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv02738
Plaintiff:
Jaime Torres
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Sheriff of Fulton County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arrollo v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv00068
Petitioner:
Ruben Campos Arrollo
Respondent:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Iglesias v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv02357
Plaintiff:
Erick Guillermo Valle Iglesias
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schenher v. Haynes et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Petitioner:
William L. Schenher, Jr.
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fellove v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv00058
Petitioner:
Damis Fellove
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Knight v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv01041
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerome Knight
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Laoren A. Grayer, Keith Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv00697
Plaintiff:
Robert Denson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Lauren Grayer, Federal Prison Industries, Inc. and others
Thompson v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00578
Plaintiff:
Lila C. Thompson and Lila C. Thompson
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Ed Nash
Cunningham v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Neally Cunningham
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Johnathan Mead, Kendell Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
