Cases 131 - 140 of 11,315
Moorman v. Risner et al
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Risner and Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
John W Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Branden Myers, Matthew Graves, Ethan Wood and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. State of Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Imari Butler
Defendant:
Indiana State of and Indiana Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ramel Theodore Troy, Ramel T. Troy and Ramel Troy
Defendant:
Niraj Bhalakia, J. Galipeau, Gary Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sowder v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Robert Sowder
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sowder v. Elkhart County Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Robert Sowder
Defendant:
Elkhart County Indiana, Vicki Elaine Becker, Goshen Public Defender Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pannell v. Schildmeir et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Pannell
Defendant:
Ronald Schildmeir, Amanda Bridegroom and Wendy Knight
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
DeQuan Cobb
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Miles
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Brian Harris
Defendant:
Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
