Cases 141 - 150 of 171
BELL v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00056
Petitioner:
GENERAL GRANT BELL
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 3:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
CARLOS KING
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH and ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00329
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00103
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROBINSON v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE ROBINSON
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH, JAMES CROSBY, ORLESTER DICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. McDonough et al
as 0:2007cv60342
Petitioner:
Willie Phillips
Respondent:
James McDonough, James McDonough and Charlie Crist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquardt v. McDonough et al
as 6:2007cv00295
Plaintiff:
Gary Marquardt
Defendant:
James McDonough, Sheriff Judd, Medical Staff, Lake Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquardt v. McDonough et al
as 3:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
Gary Marquardt
Defendant:
James McDonough, Sheriff Judd, Medical Staff, Lake Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2007cv00032
Petitioner:
SHEDRICK BROWN
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ZANDERS v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00083
Petitioner:
TROY ZANDERS
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
