Cases 141 - 150 of 185
MURPHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00579
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JONATHAN SMITH, EARL SAUNDERS, Charles Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. WASHINGTON, D.C. et al
as 1:2015mc00075
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES MURPHY, JR.
Defendant:
WASHINGTON, D.C. and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2014cv02165
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MURPHY v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2014cv01775
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and JANE & JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY et al v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01764
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN ANNE MURPHY and NATIONAL COMMITTEE TO PRESERVE SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
MURPHY v. SIXTH DISTRICT VICE UNIT et al
as 1:2014mc01130
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES MURPHY, JR.
Defendant:
SIXTH DISTRICT VICE UNIT, B. VIGIL and L. SHEFMAN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
MURPHY v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2014cv01615
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MAINE STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv00735
Plaintiff:
KENNY A. MARTIN, CARLOS ELLIS POWELL, ERIC JEROME POWELL and others
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR., STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BEY v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2013cv01687
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN KING BEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TAMMY L. DELORME, STAN L. PRITZKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. REECE et al
as 1:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
DEANELLE TACHA REECE, ANTONIN G. SCALIA, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
