Cases 141 - 150 of 1,291
WHITE v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2021cv20335
Petitioner:
MARCUS ST. CLAIRE WHITE
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SINGH v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2021cv20201
Petitioner:
HARPAL SINGH
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LUNDY v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv20184
Petitioner:
STEVEN LOVE LUNDY
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv20165
Petitioner:
ROBBY R. WILLIS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RAYMOND ROYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAZEL v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2021cv19981
Petitioner:
JUSTIN HAZEL
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARNES v. SLAUGHTER et al
as 2:2021cv19904
Petitioner:
GABRIEL C. BARNES
Respondent:
JAMES SLAUGHTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MULDROW v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv19898
Petitioner:
PATRICK R. MULDROW
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ROBERT CHETIRKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HEARNS v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2021cv19645
Petitioner:
JAMIL L HEARNS
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEACH v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2021cv19298
Petitioner:
REGINALD LEACH
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOMEZ-SERPAS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2021cv19116
Petitioner:
ROSENDO GOMEZ-SERPAS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
