Cases 141 - 150 of 192
BANDAWAT et al v. UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2008cv01112
Petitioner:
STEVEN J. BANDAWAT and PATRICIA BANDAWAT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FISHER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00908
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. FISHER and JANICE B. FISHER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , IN 47801
Cause Of Action: O
United States America v. Ronald Jamerson etal
as 2:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
United States America, United States America and United States America
Defendant:
Ronald E Jamerson and Sheryl Jamerson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Gertz v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Gertz
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States of America v. Fong
as 2:2008cv00082
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Francis K Fong
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Gertz v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Nichelle Gertz
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BRADBURN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00190
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. BRADBURN and JOHN R. BRADBURN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARTLE
as 1:2008cv00043
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN W. BARTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
MUNDY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv01421
Plaintiff:
ROBERT B. MUNDY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
HARPER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2007cv01298
Plaintiff:
LISA M. HARPER
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
