Cases 141 - 150 of 102,663
Coe v. Ewing et al
as 7:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
John M. Ewing, Sherin Dackairaj, Nadia Maria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tryon v. Bell County Law Enforcement Center
as 6:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Monee Tryon
Defendant:
Bell County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Salazar
as 5:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Anthony Robert Trejo
Respondent:
Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander v. Correctional Managed Health Care et al
as 4:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Darrold Alexander
Defendant:
Correctional Managed Health Care, Dr. Lannette Linthicum, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01127
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coleman v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01814
Petitioner:
Brandon Coleman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
