Social Security Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 141 - 150 of 12,986
Thomas v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03374
Plaintiff: Antoinette C.F. Thomas
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morris v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01598
Plaintiff: Cammie Morris
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bridges v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Bryan Bridges
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wolf v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: Zachary Carl Wolf
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff: Larie Roland Johnson
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Corbin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff: Marvin I. Corbin
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sims v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01549
Plaintiff: Carrie Sims
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Browder v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00885
Plaintiff: Toni Anderson Browder
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Banks v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00175
Plaintiff: Christopher Wayne Banks
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Farnsworth v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05008
Plaintiff: Reuben Farnsworth
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?