Cases 141 - 150 of 5,068
Johnson v. Sasnett et al
as 5:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Jamie Sasnett and JOHN DOE, 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Alonzo v. Bethany Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jaime Alonzo
Defendant:
Bethany Police Department and Aaron Plumb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. St. Anthony Shawnee Hospital Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Tiffanie Jones
Defendant:
St. Anthony Shawnee Hospital Inc doing business as SSM Health St. Anthony Hospital-Shawnee, Brian B. Baker, Karen Barnor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cotner et al v. Tulsa Mayor/ City Police & Courts et al
as 5:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Rev. R Cotner and The Moral Majority of Disenfranchised Taxpayers
Defendant:
Tulsa Mayor/ City Police & Courts, State of Oklahoma and Creek County Judges / Court DA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Glasco
as 5:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
David L Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Kurt Glasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
