Cases 141 - 150 of 13,000
Parker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Keith T. Parker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Parker v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Keith T. Parker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wolf v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Zachary Carl Wolf
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carey v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Monica Joy Carey
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Black v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Beverly Black and Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hulse v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03016
Plaintiff:
Sheralyn K. Hulse
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Caesar v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Amy Leigh Caesar
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heard v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Heard
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Andrews v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Mary Jean Andrews
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Baumgarden v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Deanna L. Baumgarden
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
