Cases 151 - 160 of 164
Barraza v. Gentry et al
as 2:2014cv01185
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and J. Gentry
Petitioner:
Jessica Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gateb v. Gentry et al
as 2:2014cv00895
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Serena Gateb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spikes v. Nevada Department of Correction et al
as 2:2014cv00873
Defendant:
Albany, Attorney General, Ms. Belenger and others
Plaintiff:
Quiwaneca Spikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barraza v. Gentry et al
as 2:2014cv00766
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and J. Gentry
Petitioner:
Jessica Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gateb v. Gentry
as 2:2014cv00741
Petitioner:
Serena Gateb
Respondent:
Jo Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jiles v. Williams et al
as 2:2014cv00712
Defendant:
Cheryl Dressler, J. Gentry, B. Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jiles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balsamo v. Gentry et al
as 2:2013cv01648
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Gentry
Petitioner:
Stephanie Balsamo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. SDCC et al
as 2:2013cv01379
Defendant:
C. Burson, S.L. Foster, J. Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Jermaine Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv01029
Defendant:
S. Brooks, Cheryl Burson, T. Carlman and others
Plaintiff:
Ian A. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00666
Defendant:
James Cox, Sheryl Foster, J. Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
