Cases 151 - 160 of 232
MAGEE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86340
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., 3M, IMO INDUSTRIES and others
Plaintiff:
BILLY RAY MAGEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WERTH v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86387
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., BECHTEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
LINDA WERTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SISCO v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86370
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, VIACOM, INC., JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KENNETH SISCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FENNEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86301
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, CRANE COMPANY, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS JOSEPH FENNEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAGEE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86341
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE, VIACOM, INC., MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE MAGEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAAB v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86360
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DAVID RAAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86374
Defendant:
BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., 3M and others
Plaintiff:
BILLIE WAYNE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUDSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86320
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY L. HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86382
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MESHONA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86277
Defendant:
AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, BECHTEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE H. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
