Cases 151 - 160 of 171
ZANDERS v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2007cv00081
Petitioner:
TROY ZANDERS
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REED v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2007cv00047
Petitioner:
LOUIS REED, JR
Respondent:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA and JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00032
Petitioner:
ALONZO MOORE
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BALDWIN v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00042
Petitioner:
JOSHUA BALDWIN
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2007cv00017
Petitioner:
PAUL WHITE
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEAVER v. CROSBY et al
as 4:2007cv00038
Plaintiff:
GREENIE WEAVER
Defendant:
JAMES V CROSBY, JAMES MCDONOUGH, SAM CULPEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. McDonough
as 0:2007cv60106
Plaintiff:
Clifford Jackson
Defendant:
James McDonough and James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Equatore v. McDonough
as 0:2007cv60108
Plaintiff:
David Equatore
Defendant:
James McDonough and James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MATHIS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 5:2007cv00020
Petitioner:
CALVIN L MATHIS
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONOUGH and BILL MCCOLLUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarthy v. McDonough
as 0:2007cv60093
Plaintiff:
Dennis Michael McCarthy
Defendant:
James McDonough, James McDonough and James McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
