Cases 151 - 160 of 175
Harmon v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Rosie A. Harmon
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calvie v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joanne Calvie
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martino v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Martino
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michell v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Dwight Michell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lassiter v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
James Lassiter
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Vera James
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rumbley v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
Courtney Rumbley
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deford v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Lois Deford
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dowdy v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Michael Dowdy
Defendant:
DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Marshall Clark
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
