Cases 151 - 160 of 1,295
HAZEL v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2021cv19981
Petitioner:
JUSTIN HAZEL
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LUNDY v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv20184
Petitioner:
STEVEN LOVE LUNDY
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCDOWELL v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2021cv18468
Petitioner:
JAMES MCDOWELL and SISA BUTU
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARNES v. SLAUGHTER et al
as 2:2021cv19904
Petitioner:
GABRIEL C. BARNES
Respondent:
JAMES SLAUGHTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MONTGOMERY v. GAMP et al
as 2:2021cv16607
Petitioner:
STEVEN D. MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
JOHNATHAN GAMP and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEACH v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2021cv19298
Petitioner:
REGINALD LEACH
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOMEZ-SERPAS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2021cv19116
Petitioner:
ROSENDO GOMEZ-SERPAS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv16164
Petitioner:
JONATHAN THOMAS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RAYMOND ROYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EPPS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2021cv16719
Petitioner:
ERIC EPPS
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SUAREZ-PEREZ v. ROYCE et al
as 3:2021cv15948
Petitioner:
ANTONIO SUAREZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
