Cases 151 - 160 of 215
Weinstein-Bacal v. Wendt-Hughes et al
as 3:2010cv01750
Plaintiff:
Stuart A. Weinstein-Bacal
Defendant:
Frederick Wendt-Hughes, Alice Wendt, La Julia Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JF Martinez & Co. et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC-R)
as 3:2010cv01731
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC-R)
Plaintiff:
JF Martinez & Co., Reinaldo Fuentes-Davila and Flor M. Lugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Betancourt v. Vigoritto et al
as 3:2010cv01602
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Betancourt
Defendant:
Alfred P. Vigoritto, Sally Vigoritto, Diane Cenme and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Gold and Watches Corp. v. Alishaev Bros., Inc.
as 3:2010cv01491
Plaintiff:
Gold and Watches Corp.
Defendant:
Alishaev Bros., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estancias de Villa Real, Inc. v. Sherwin Williams de Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01442
Plaintiff:
Estancias de Villa Real, Inc.
Defendant:
Sherwin Williams de Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2010cv01286
Defendant:
San Cristobal Hospital and John Doe
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Vasarhelyi v. Zalduondo
as 3:2010cv01199
Plaintiff:
Michele Taburno Vasarhelyi
Defendant:
Fernando Zalduondo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
M&N Aviation, Inc. v. United Parcel Service et al
as 3:2010cv01137
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, UPS Worldwide Fowarding Service, Inc and UPS Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
M&N Aviation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Dion et al v. El Patio de Sam, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01117
Plaintiff:
Lois J. Dion and Ed Dion
Defendant:
El Patio de Sam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Antonsanti-Pons v. Domenech
as 3:2009cv02246
Plaintiff:
Mary Lynne Antonsanti-Pons
Defendant:
Enrique Domenech, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
