Cases 151 - 160 of 3,038
Powell v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Jarmel Makeith Powell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Juanita D. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Tate v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
James Jensen Tate
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Saunders v. Kijakazi
as 6:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Na'Starja Saunders
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sherry Saunders Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carpenter v. Barnhart
as 7:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Adam Scott Carpenter
Defendant:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fam v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01059
Plaintiff:
Mark Fam
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wilde v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Wilde
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maggi v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Maggi
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
M. v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
