Cases 161 - 170 of 289
Hicks et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
William Michael Hicks , Kenneth Harms , Matthew Achatz and others
Defendant:
PGA Tour, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hale v. Vahl et al
as 3:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jack Hale
Defendant:
Robert Vahl , Steve Barsch , William F. Gentile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods v. Roddrick, et al.
as 2:2014cv02458
Plaintiff:
Tajhikeem Woods
Defendant:
Roddrick, A. Arnold and G. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Alexander Quarterman v. Rich Hale et al
as 5:2014cv02013
Defendant:
Sergeant Rich Hale, Sergeant Rich Hale, Judge Steve C. Malone and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Alexander Quarterman
Martinez et al v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 3:2014cv02071
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo L. Martinez , Antonio Martinez , Abram S. Miller, Jr and others
Defendant:
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
People's United Equipment Finance Corp. fka Financial Federal Credit Inc. v. Hale et al
as 1:2014cv01272
Plaintiff:
People's United Equipment Finance Corp.
Defendant:
Scott Wesley Hale and Hook Service Crane & Rigging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
L. H. et al v. John Kerry et al
as 2:2014cv06212
Defendant:
John Doe, David Hale, John Kerry and others
Plaintiff:
L. H., Najwa Hajjar, Basel Herbly and others
Kim Collins et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05792
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Beaty, Margaret Beaty, Ollie Bradshaw and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Denelle Bailey et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01930
Plaintiff:
Lorita Adams, Betty Atkins, Denelle Bailey and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Loretta Curley et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01876
Plaintiff:
Janet Anglin, Ruby Barnes, Ira Bennett and others
Defendant:
John Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
